Foreword / YouTube Video Review

I was loaned these by the manufacturer to review. I was not paid nor did I receive any other form of compensation for this review.

All my reviews are done on my own time with great care to give you all the best set of data and information I can provide in order to help you make a well-informed purchase decision. I offer this for free to all who are interested. In return, if you want to support this site please see the bottom of this review for ways you can help. It is greatly appreciated.

If, after reading this review, you decide you’d like to buy this speaker then please consider using my affiliate link below. I earn a small commission from it at no additional cost to you:
Amazon Purchase Link

The review on this website is a brief overview and summary of the objective performance of this speaker. It is not intended to be a deep dive. Moreso, this is information for those who prefer “just the facts” and prefer to have the data without the filler.

Manufacturer Specs:

• Flat frequency response from 50Hz to 40kHz
• 80W (RMS) total output power, with SPL up to 98dB (@ 1 meter)
• Fine-tuned 4.5" mid-bass drivers and 1" silk dome tweeters
• Full digital signal processing, 2-way active crossover, and DRC
• Hi-Res Audio and Hi-Res Audio Wireless certified
• Multiple settings for room acoustic compensation
• Balanced XLR, balanced TRS, RCA, and AUX inputs, with a headphone output socket
• Bluetooth V6.0 audio receiver supporting multipoint connection
• Dual preset sound modes and customizable EQs by the EDIFIER ConneX App
• The MDF cabinet effectively reduces distortion and resonance

As of this writing MSRP is $249/pair.

CTA-2034 (SPINORAMA) and Accompanying Data

All data collected using Klippel’s Near-Field Scanner. The Near-Field-Scanner 3D (NFS) offers a fully automated acoustic measurement of direct sound radiated from the source under test. The radiated sound is determined in any desired distance and angle in the 3D space outside the scanning surface. Directivity, sound power, SPL response and many more key figures are obtained for any kind of loudspeaker and audio system in near field applications (e.g. studio monitors, mobile devices) as well as far field applications (e.g. professional audio systems). Utilizing a minimum of measurement points, a comprehensive data set is generated containing the loudspeaker’s high resolution, free field sound radiation in the near and far field. For a detailed explanation of how the NFS works and the science behind it, please watch the below discussion with designer Christian Bellmann:

IMPORTANT SETUP INFO: This speaker was measured with the reference point at the tweeter. Speaker was broken in. DSP settings were “default” with no EQ or other settings enabled. The default mode is “Movie” mode. However, I do provide a comparison of the “Music” mode at the end of this review.

Measurements are provided in a format in accordance with the Standard Method of Measurement for In-Home Loudspeakers (ANSI/CTA-2034-A R-2020). For more information, please see this link.

CTA-2034 / SPINORAMA:

The On-axis Frequency Response (0°) is the universal starting point and in many situations it is a fair representation of the first sound to arrive at a listener’s ears.

The Listening Window is a spatial average of the nine amplitude responses in the ±10º vertical and ±30º horizontal angular range. This encompasses those listeners who sit within a typical home theater audience, as well as those who disregard the normal rules when listening alone.

The Early Reflections curve is an estimate of all single-bounce, first-reflections, in a typical listening room.

Sound Power represents all of the sounds arriving at the listening position after any number of reflections from any direction. It is the weighted rms average of all 70 measurements, with individual measurements weighted according to the portion of the spherical surface that they represent.

Sound Power Directivity Index (SPDI): In this standard the SPDI is defined as the difference between the listening window curve and the sound power curve.

Early Reflections Directivity Index (EPDI): is defined as the difference between the listening window curve and the early reflections curve. In small rooms, early reflections figure prominently in what is measured and heard in the room so this curve may provide insights into potential sound quality.

Early Reflections Breakout:

Floor bounce: average of 20º, 30º, 40º down

Ceiling bounce: average of 40º, 50º, 60º up

Front wall bounce: average of 0º, ± 10º, ± 20º, ± 30º horizontal

Side wall bounces: average of ± 40º, ± 50º, ± 60º, ± 70º, ± 80º horizontal

Rear wall bounces: average of 180º, ± 90º horizontal

Estimated In-Room Response:

In theory, with complete 360-degree anechoic data on a loudspeaker and sufficient acoustical and geometrical data on the listening room and its layout it would be possible to estimate with good precision what would be measured by an omnidirectional microphone located in the listening area of that room. By making some simplifying assumptions about the listening space, the data set described above permits a usefully accurate preview of how a given loudspeaker might perform in a typical domestic listening room. Obviously, there are no guarantees, because individual rooms can be acoustically aberrant. Sometimes rooms are excessively reflective (“live”) as happens in certain hot, humid climates, with certain styles of interior décor and in under-furnished rooms. Sometimes rooms are excessively “dead” as in other styles of décor and in some custom home theaters where acoustical treatment has been used excessively. This form of post processing is offered only as an estimate of what might happen in a domestic living space with carpet on the floor and a “normal” amount of seating, drapes and cabinetry.

For these limited circumstances it has been found that a usefully accurate Predicted In-Room (PIR) amplitude response, also known as a “room curve” is obtained by a weighted average consisting of 12 % listening window, 44 % early reflections and 44 % sound power. At very high frequencies errors can creep in because of excessive absorption, microphone directivity, and room geometry. These discrepancies are not considered to be of great importance.

Horizontal Contour Plot (normalized):

Vertical Contour Plot (normalized):

Additional Measurements

Response Linearity

Horizontal Frequency Response:

Vertical Frequency Response:

Step Response

Group Delay

Burst Decay

This data is full anechoic where most spectral decay type graphics are created using quasi-anechoic data. For more information on the differences between Burst Decay and Cumulative Spectral Decay (CSD) graphics please see Section 6.5 of the ARTA User Manual linked below. I would like to extend a professional "thank you" to Ivo Mateljan for this software.

ARTA User Manual

Harmonic Distortion

Harmonic Distortion at 86dB @ 1m:

Harmonic Distortion at 96dB @ 1m:

Dynamic Range (Instantaneous Compression Test)

The below graphic indicates just how much SPL is lost (compression) or gained (enhancement; usually due to distortion) when the speaker is played at higher output volumes instantly via a 2.7 second logarithmic sine sweep referenced to 76dB at 1 meter. The signals are played consecutively without any additional stimulus applied. Then normalized against the 76dB result.

The tests are conducted in this fashion:

1. 76dB at 1 meter (baseline; black)
2. 86dB at 1 meter (red)
3. 96dB at 1 meter (blue)
4. 102dB at 1 meter (purple)

The purpose of this test is to illustrate how much (if at all) the output changes as a speaker’s components temperature increases (i.e., voice coils, crossover components) instantaneously.

Multitone Distortion

The following tests are conducted at (4) approximate equivalent output volumes: 70/79/87/96dB @ 1 meter. The (4) voltages listed in the legend result in these SPL values. This test signal is dense, similar to pink noise and excites the entire spectrums listed below at the same time. The test signal lasts 30 seconds. This is different than the sine wave test signal used to measure frequency response. The purpose of this distortion and compression test is to illustrate how much (if at all) the output changes as a speaker’s components temperature increases (i.e., voice coils, crossover components) over time.

Given the test signal is similar to pink noise and exciting the entire spectrum at the same time I also include compression results, which is captured at the same time distortion is captured. Sometimes these results differ from the compression results you see above (namely with powered designs incorporating DSP-based limiting).

Note: The KLIPPEL software shows compression in the positive scale.

The test was conducted in (3) manners:

1. Full bandwidth (20Hz to 20kHz)
2. 80Hz to 20kHz

The reason for the two measurements is to simulate running the speaker full range vs using a high-pass filter at 80Hz. However, note: the 2nd test low frequency limit at 80Hz is a “brick wall” and doesn’t quite emulate a standard filter of 12 or 24dB/octave. But… it’s close enough to illustrate the point.

1. Full bandwidth (20Hz to 20kHz)

2. 80Hz to 20kHz

Movie Mode (Default) vs Music Mode

Parting / Random Thoughts

Overall Objective Assessment

The Edifier MR4.5 is a compact powered desktop speaker that delivers surprisingly good bass extension for its size, reaching approximately 60 Hz F3 and 44 Hz F10. Its frequency response is somewhat uneven, however, with a broad upper-bass emphasis around 120–150 Hz, several irregularities through the midrange, a notable recession around 2–3 kHz, and elevated energy through portions of the treble. This suggests a somewhat warm or full upper-bass character, a recessed presence region, and a comparatively brighter treble balance.

Directivity is also imperfect. Horizontal dispersion is relatively wide but becomes irregular through the crossover region, while vertical dispersion shows considerably stronger lobing. Because of this, listening height is important, and I would recommend positioning or tilting the speakers so the tweeter/acoustic axis is aimed toward the listener.

Output capability is the MR4.5’s most significant limitation. The 86 dB test shows relatively little compression, but meaningful compression is already present at 96 dB, particularly at lower frequencies. The nominal 102 dB condition is well beyond the speaker’s useful linear operating range, with severe compression and limiting across broad portions of the spectrum.

Multitone distortion follows a similar pattern. At moderate levels the results are considerably better, but distortion increases substantially as the speaker is pushed harder, becoming particularly high through approximately 700 Hz–3 kHz at the highest drive level. Subjectively, I would expect the combination of compression and nonlinear distortion to make the MR4.5 sound increasingly congested, grainy, and strained near its limits. Complex music may lose clarity and separation, while additional volume increases produce progressively less clean acoustic output.

These limitations are considerably less concerning for the MR4.5’s intended desktop/nearfield application, where listening distances of approximately one meter or less require much less output from each speaker. They become significantly more relevant if the speakers are used at conventional room listening distances or expected to reproduce high playback levels.

Overall, the Edifier MR4.5 offers impressive bass extension for a small desktop speaker and reasonable performance at moderate nearfield listening levels, but its uneven frequency response, irregular directivity, and limited high-output capability are notable compromises. It is best viewed as a nearfield desktop speaker rather than a small conventional room speaker, and listeners who stay within its comfortable output range should avoid the significant compression and distortion evident when it is pushed hard.

Support / Contribute

I do not take adspace nor do manufacturers pay me for reviews. All revenue is through YouTube ad-revenue or directly from contributions from viewers such as yourself. While this is not my full-time job it’s cool when I’m able to make a few bucks for my efforts.

If you’d like to support the channel I have listed a few ways below. Thank you!

Patreon:
Want to be more involved? On Patreon you can vote in polls, see behind-the-scenes stuff, read about the occasional manufacturer drama (fun, right?), and help shape what I do next.
👉 https://www.patreon.com/erinsaudiocorner

Donate Via PayPal:
If you would like to contribute directly via PayPal that would be appreciated!
👉 https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=CLHSW4L9SBSLY

Generic Affiliate Links:
Anytime you’re buying something online — whether it’s speakers, TVs, or just everyday stuff — you can use the clickable links below. I get a small commission (at no extra cost to you), and it adds up more than you’d think.
Amazon
Crutchfield
Audio Advice
AsciLab Speakers
Arendal Sound
Best Buy
AliExpress
Wal-Mart
Parts-Express
Newegg
Samsung
Target
Thomann
Emotiva
Monoprice

Thank You For Your Support!